July 20, 2010

  • Blog Subscriptions and Time-Stamping

    One of the most frequent complaints on xanga has to do with time-stamping (the other most frequent complaints are probably… grammar, drama, and dearricky?) Various ideas proposed to fix the problem (including this one, proposed by myself) have fallen upon deaf ears thus far (as have every single other idea proposed in the last two years. I don’t know why people even continue to make them.) I desperately wanted a way for blogs I’d already read to stop appearing back in my inbox when time-stamped. I really hate being bombarded, but I also hate missing posts, and I know I’m not the only one.

    In the mean time, I’ve also been looking for a way to keep track of blogs off xanga. People like novelle360, who originated on xanga but later moved, have continued to write blogs I want to read. Of course, it also means I can no longer subscribe through my normal xanga interface. I tried RSS readers, which turned out to be a pain in the ass, and twitter, which is annoying and fails too often, but ultimately fell back on simply book-marking, and remembering to click once in a while, and then reading backward to catch any entries I might have missed.

    Anyway, so the other day I was on facebook (which I do exceedingly rarely, because that’s obnoxious enough on its own… friend me at facebook.com/nikbv!) and I noticed a “friend” had linked her blog post to facebook through something called bloglovin’. I then pulsed, asking if anybody had heard of it and… it seemed nobody had. So, I put on my wading boots and investigated, alone.


    Click

    It was scary. It was, at times, quit alarmingly full of fashion blogs (the native bloglovin’ community is apparently entirely made up of fashionistas and home decorators). But, I think it’s actually a really useful tool. See, I’ve created an account, and I added in not only all my favourite xangans, but also all my favourite blogs off xanga. Simply type in the url, hit follow, and bam! You then get a list of all the unread blog posts from those blogs (from the moment of following. It doesn’t give you a million back-posts). You then simply click on them, and read. When you click on a post, it goes grey on the list, and moves down. After you read a post (or mark it as read) you never need to see it again! Ever!

    On the other hand, if you really love it, you can hit the “like” button and keep it handy. You can also click on the post at the top of your to read list, and then, once you read (or decide to skip the post), hit the next button on a floating bloglovin’ bottom bar, and go automatically to the next blog entry on your list.

    I found all this incredibly convenient, and have been messing around with this for the past few days (so, if you’ve seen footprints from me with the referee being some bloglovin’ link, this is why). The only two problems I can find are this: firstly, if the xangan has any kind of lock (footprints, sign-in, friends, etc) you can’t be followed by bloglovin’; secondly, some blogs (so far, the only ones I’ve found are on the NY Times website) have an anti-floating bar thingy to makes it disappear, which is annoying. Otherwise, you can put all your blog subscriptions into one place.

    Of course, it doesn’t replace xanga. It doesn’t stop you from commenting, posting, and interacting in exactly the way you’re doing now. It just replaces or supplements your subscription page, and helps remove some of the hassle. Want me to make sure I’ll never miss your post, without having to worry about time-stamping? Make sure there are no locks, and I’ll follow it on bloglovin’. Problem solved.

Comments (21)

  • I try my best to wait at least 2 hours before timestamping.  Why do I do it at all?   Well – when one has over 10,000 subs – one has to reach those in different time zones.

    To me, anything less then 2 hours is just being desperate.  After all – the average person who’s online is only there for an hour or so….

    the rest of us are just freaks and addicts…

  • i timestamp once… hours after i posted it the first time.

    Bloglovin is great.  i’m on itttt.  but yeah, it’s very fashion-oriented.  weird.  i thought i had made a wrong turn.

  • @TheBigShowAtUD - You? Make a wrong turn? psh :D

  • I agree with the time stamping issue. I don’t mind time stamping at all, but it would be nice if those didn’t re-appear if you’ve already read it or don’t want to read it. I submitted an Idea a long time ago, to make the inbox more like email, so you could “save” and “delete” posts from the inbox, and if you’ve already clicked the link, it won’t re-appear.

  • @edlives - I try my best to wait at least 2 hours before timestamping.  Why do I do it at all?   Well – when one has over 10,000 subs – one has to reach those in different time zones.

    Wow! This must mean that you’re a more important and better blogger than those who don’t timestamp! I’m happy that you’re providing your users this service of unsolicited reiteration. Brand new entries don’t deserve their spot on the universial inbox. No! It’s a spot reserved for self-important Xangans with subscription lists bulging at the belt.

    …After all – the average person who’s online is only there for an hour or so….

    Every single fucking Xangan, regardless of subscription list size, sufers from this problem. When you decide to cheat the rules, you do it at the detriment of the non-timestmaping Xangan.

    The larger your fucking subscription less, the less fucking reason you have to timestamp. Your special little entry will pass through more eyes, and when any fucking one of your crowd of readers deems it worthy, it gets ‘reced! Voila! A merit-based nudge to the top of universal inbox!

  • This function should just be taken off, because most people here can’t handle it the right way. 

  • Thanks. Wasn’t familiar w/ bloglovin’. I’ll have to check it out.

    I definitely agree w/ you about time-stamping; I’d already voted yes on your idea. (I’d also like to see something done about the pulses and the rec’s as well.)

  • @HappyLemming - I LOVE your sense of sarcasm in your response…LOL

    On a serious note, you provide very good points.   Time stamping shouldn’t be taken too lightly.

  • @edlives - Sorry about the tone of the comment. I’m prickly.

  • Bloglovin is pretty good. But I’m only using it to follow people not on Xanga. Timestamping isn’t that big of a deal to me. (Of course, not many people I’m subbed to timestamp.) 

  • This is an interesting idea…

  • I remember when they were considering a change which would have meant people would have to use credits to timestamp or if they timestamped an article more than twice a day then it would deduct some many credits from the account every time.

  • is it like google reader or something?

  • You are an amazing man!  Wow! I’ll check this out!

    Oh yes, and thanks for visiting my humble site and leaving a comment on my most recent post, “Daddy, David had his eyes open ………”  You are the only commenter so far.

  • @naphtali_deer - You seem to be a ‘crusader!’  Why are you against so many things?  I think Xanga has far more going for it than against it, at least technically!

  • @Grampa_David - My point was that pulses, recs and time stamping very often gets in the way of my seeing new things people have written. So in that way, I guess I am crusading for those people who very often get lost in the shuffle and don’t timestamp. Besides the universal inbox, if there were a way that posts, recs and pulses could be separated out, I think that would be helpful. I do like Xanga very much; that wasn’t a dis on it, but that’s my opinion as to how I think it would be even better, though I realize not everyone is going to agree with that.

  • lol… I like the comments here. I only time stamp if I write something around 5am. I move it to 3pm or 8pm just once. But, I’m a bit lazy when it comes to blogging these days, so no one sees any of this. I don’t timestamp when I edit something… 

    lazy blogger out.

  • Only broomstick humpers timestamp.

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *